NameEmelia Henrietta Croker [4, 1861 ref: RG09, piece 1802, folio 20, p. 34], [4, 1861 ref: RG09, piece 1802, folio 21, p. 35], [4, 1881 ref: RG11 piece 3103, folio 42, p. 10]
Birth1860, Leamington, Warks
Notes for Emelia Henrietta Croker
No birth or baptism record found.
However a baptism record is found for Emelia Henrietta Croker who may have been the one in her grandmother’s house in Cheltenham in 1861:
Name: Emelia Henrietta Croker
Gender: Female
Christening Date: 01 Apr 1860
Christening Place: LEAMINGTON, WARWICK, ENGLAND
Father's Name: Richard Croker
Mother's Name: Frances Sophia
And the registration is:
First name(s) EMILIA HENRIETTA
Last name CROKER
Birth year 1860
Birth quarter 1
Mother's maiden name Baker
District Warwick
County Warwickshire
Country England
Volume 6D
Page 497
Record set England & Wales Births 1837-2006
This leads me to the conclusion that this Emilia as not the daughter of Catherine Frances Croker née Harding. Further the 1861 census is her with her family. In due course I shall create her parents and move her to them.
_________________
In 1861 this has to be her in the census, with her parents and paternal grandmother at 17, Royal Parade, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire:
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Age Birth year Occupation Birth place
Emelia Croker Head Widow Female 61 1800 - Golcar, Yorkshire
Richard Croker Son Married Male 37 1824 Army Retired Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Frances Croker Daughter In Law Married Female 21 1840 - Leamington, Warwickshire
Louisa Croker Daughter Unmarried Female 24 1837 - Foston, Yorkshire
Amelia Croker Granddaughter - Female 1 1860 - Leamington, Warwickshire
Harriett Dance Servant Unmarried Female 27 1834 Ladys Maid Berrow, Worcestershire
Jane ... Servant Unmarried Female 21 1840 Nurse Crich, Northamptonshire
Ref:
Archive reference RG09
Piece number 1802
Folio 20
Page 34
_________________
Not found in 1871, but with her mother (or even aunt) and aunt’s mother in 1881.
_________________
She got married in 1882 to one Ernest Young Drew. But this is of no further interest as she was not a Powys relative, save through marriage.
_________________