Powys-Lybbe Forbears - Person Sheet
Powys-Lybbe Forbears - Person Sheet
NameArthur Henry Mure 
[27, LG of Scotland 2001, Mure of Caldwell article, p. 1064], [62, 107th edn of 2003, Portarlington article, vol III, p. 3180]
[27, LG of Scotland 2001, Mure of Caldwell article, p. 1064], [62, 107th edn of 2003, Portarlington article, vol III, p. 3180]Birth22 Jul 1847
Death12 Feb 1931
General2nd s. Of S. Kensington.
EducationWestminster
FatherJames Mure (1796-1876)
MotherEmily Davis Heatley (-1854)
Spouses
Marriage4 Feb 1875, MaryLeBone district, London [27, LG of Scotland 2001, Mure of Caldwell article, p. 1064], [3, Their marriage Q1 of 1875, Marylebone dist, vol 1a, p. 787]
ChildrenMarjorie Mary (1876-1945)
Godfrey Arthur Stanhope (ca1880-1917)
James George Dawson (1883-1966)
Notes for Arthur Henry Mure
No Mure births were found on FreeBMD for 1847 nor one for him between 1845 and 1849.
_______________________________________________
The 1881 census has this entry which may, or may not, be he:
Name Relation Marital Status Gender Age Birthplace Occupation Disability
Samuel WEST Head U Male 32 Carlisle, Cumberland, England Physician Oxford M.R.C.P. London
Arthur H. MURE Boarder M Male 33 London, Middlesex, England Brewery Owner
Ellen HOLLAND Serv U Female 27 Kempsey, Worcester, England Cook
Elizabeth BALLS Serv U Female 23 Wormingford, Essex, England Parlour Maid
Rose PINK Serv U Female 18 Bayswater, Middlesex, England Housemaid
Source Information:
Dwelling 15 Wimpole St
Census Place London, Middlesex, England
Family History Library Film 1341031
Public Records Office Reference RG11
Piece / Folio 0140 / 85
Page Number 26
This makes me very curious: it could well be him, particularly as he is listed as married. But where he was living was in Wimpole Street which is the classic place for private doctors of considerable expense. The Head of the house was a doctor. So I wonder if he was not in fact very well and was being treated for something or other, for which he would be paying and thus a ‘Boarder’? Or should he be described as a ‘Patient’?
It would make this clearer if his wife could be found on the census but I simply could not achieve that, neither under her married or her maiden names.
__________________________________________
_______________________________________________
The 1881 census has this entry which may, or may not, be he:
Name Relation Marital Status Gender Age Birthplace Occupation Disability
Samuel WEST Head U Male 32 Carlisle, Cumberland, England Physician Oxford M.R.C.P. London
Arthur H. MURE Boarder M Male 33 London, Middlesex, England Brewery Owner
Ellen HOLLAND Serv U Female 27 Kempsey, Worcester, England Cook
Elizabeth BALLS Serv U Female 23 Wormingford, Essex, England Parlour Maid
Rose PINK Serv U Female 18 Bayswater, Middlesex, England Housemaid
Source Information:
Dwelling 15 Wimpole St
Census Place London, Middlesex, England
Family History Library Film 1341031
Public Records Office Reference RG11
Piece / Folio 0140 / 85
Page Number 26
This makes me very curious: it could well be him, particularly as he is listed as married. But where he was living was in Wimpole Street which is the classic place for private doctors of considerable expense. The Head of the house was a doctor. So I wonder if he was not in fact very well and was being treated for something or other, for which he would be paying and thus a ‘Boarder’? Or should he be described as a ‘Patient’?
It would make this clearer if his wife could be found on the census but I simply could not achieve that, neither under her married or her maiden names.
__________________________________________